Published
on
June 23, 2015
| 1,515 views
| 0 followers
members are following updates on this item.
|
If you think it’s rude to ask to look at your co-authors’ data, you’re not doing science
Retraction Watch
Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
“If you think it’s rude to ask to look at your co-authors’ data, you’re not doing science”: Guest post
Last month, the community was shaken when a major study on gay marriage in Science was retracted following questions on its funding, data, and methodology. The senior author, Donald Green, made it clear he was not privy to many details of the paper — which raised some questions for C. K. Gunsalus, director of the National Center for Professional and Research Ethics, and Drummond Rennie, a former deputy editor at JAMA.We are pleased to present their guest post, about how co-authors can carry out their responsibilities to each other and the community.
C. K. Gunsalus
Just about everyone understands that even careful and meticulous people can be taken in by a smart, committed liar. What’s harder to understand is when a professional is fooled by lies that would have been prevented or caught by adhering to community norms and honoring one’s role and responsibilities in the scientific ecosystem.
Viewed 1,514 times
Page Options
